The Impact of Person-Environment Fit and Psychological Capital on Organizational Commitment

Introduction

An organization can be defined as a group of people working together towards a common purpose or set of goals (Eknath & Gadekar, 2020). The people or the ‘human resources’ are therefore the greatest assets for most companies. The people drive the company towards its vision. Thus, it is only logical that every organization strives hard to keep their most valuable asset happy and satisfied at work. Life in contemporary organizations is interconnected, intertwined, and sometimes complicated, so we find in the vast majority of matters that most aspects of work are intertwined together and are affected by each other, directly or indirectly, positively or negatively, and to a large, medium or low degree. Hence, by studying the factors that mediate and moderate the employees’ satisfaction with their job and their desire to continue working for an organization the present study will contribute to the enhancement of the organizational environment and workplace productivity of the telecommunications businesses.

The factors that impact a person’s commitment and desire to work in an organization may be related to the industry and its specifics. For the UAE, telecommunications has been a gover priority in terms of business development and support, and this sector is expected to grow substantlly by 2025 (Mordor Intelligence, 2021). Hence, by studying the factors that mediate and moderate the employees’ satisfaction with their job and their desire to continue working for an organization the present study will contribute to the enhancement of the organizational environment and workplace productivity of the telecommunications businesses.

Likewise, we find that the scientific research conducted on today’s organizations deal with the study of some variables, whether they are independent, intermediate, or dependent, in order to know the type and degree of interrelationships among these variables, and you find that there are interrelated, and overlapping relationships between these variables (Smith, 2018). The current research will study the relationships between six variables as follows:

1. Person-Environment Fit
2. Psychological Capital
3. Job Satisfaction
4. Job Engagement
5. Organizational Commitment
6. Intention to Stay.

By looking at some of the related previous studies, the researcher found that they dealt with two or more of these variables, and that they found significant relationships between them (Abdullah et al., 2011; Smith, 2018). But the researcher did not find a single study interested in studying the relationships between all these variables at the same.

In a business context, the issues on improving job satisfaction and organizational commitment tend to be discussed most of the time, for example, by Aizzat et al. (2003) and others. This is because these elements have become a strategic driver for a successful business. In most organizations, they prefer to derive benefits in their way from their ethical efforts in the form of increased employee satisfaction and commitment; however, they yet have figured out how to do it successfully. However, some previous research studies showed that employee’s resignation from one organization only after a few months of work to seek another job did show an increase in number throughout recent years (Abdullah et al., 2019; Smith, 2018). The current study is concerned with determining the relationship between (Person-Environment Fit & Psychological Capital) and (Job Satisfaction & Job Engagement) and its impact on (Organizational Commitment & Intention to Stay) by conducting an applied research in the UAE ICT Sector.

Telecommunications as the Study Context

Firstly, to brief the readers on the specifics of the information and communications technology (ICT) sector in the UAE, it is necessary to look at its history, present, and future perspectives. According to Mordor Intelligence’s (2021) report, the compound annual growth of this industry will be at 3.5% by 2025. This rapid growth is attributed to the government’s focus on ICT as they have established policies that contribute to the development of these businesses, such as the 2003 Telecom Law. Additionally, Mordor Intelligence (2021) ITU News (2011), and TDRA (n.d.) report that the growth of ICT is associated with the end-user interest in telecommunications, mainly the internet and applications such as IoT, cloud computing, and others.

The ICT sector in the UAE has been growing exponentially in the past. As for the future, there are several initiatives, such as the Dubai Smart City or the introduction of the 5G connection across the state, which will contribute to the future growth of this industry (Mordor Intelligence, 2021). Notably, the COVID-19 pandemic has affected the ICT and contributed to the 1.5% decrease in the revenue of the ICT companies (Mordor Intelligence, 2021). However, the prospects for the future suggest that ICT will continue to grow and develop, as this is one of the centers of the government’s attention, which means that more people will be employed in the ICT-related businesses, and organizations’ leaders will have to look for strategies for effectively managing their human resources.

When looking at the history of the ICT sector in UAE, its establishment and further developments are linked to the introduction of Radio and other telecommunications technologies (TRDA, n.d.). Naturally, as the telegraph, telephone, and radio technologies became available in the UAE, both individual consumers and businesses began to use these technologies. However, until 2007 the industry’s development has been constrained as not much competition was present. In 2007 the government introduced its liberalization policies and created a licensing system that would allow more businesses to begin working in telecommunications (ITU News, 2011). Moreover, in 2010 based on the ICT Development Index, the UAE has been ranked as the state with the most developed infrastructure in this sector (ITU News, 2011).

The UAE ICT sector can be characterized by significant growth within the last decades, where the Telecommunications and Digital Government Regulatory Authority (TDRA, n.d.) is the main responsible party. The government of the UAE sets a high priority on the development and implementation of ICT in various spheres of life.

the UAE’s businsses pay great attention to measuring the satisfaction of employees at the workplaces, the evidence is quite limited regarding the ICT sector. In their study, Murali and Aggarwal (2020) examine the impact of transformational leadership style on employee engagement and job satisfaction. The authors revealed that there is a strong positive correlation between the mentioned leadership style and employee engagement. Accordingly, it is assumed that higher employee engagement serves as a moderator of organizational commitment and person-environment fit (Murali & Aggarwal, 2020). The study also demonstrates that employee engagement enhances the confidence of employees regarding their performance, which can be considered as a positive impact on psychological capital accumulation.

As for job satisfaction of employees as a mediating factor in the UAE ICT sector, the companies strive to use this concept to manage associated variables, such as person-environment fit, organizational commitment, and intention to stay. However, the relationships between these variables and the mediating factor are not yet properly studied in this field. Abdulla et al. (2011) state that the collectivist culture of the UAE makes external and internal factors of job satisfaction important. Therefore, further studies are critical to establishing specific relationships between the above-mentioned variables so that the findings can benefit in adjusting the ICT sector workplaces through employee engagement and job satisfaction.

Statement of the Problem

Since the ICT sector is an important industry for the economic development of the UAE, research that contributes to the enhancement of workplace productivity and work effectiveness can help organizations’ leaders manage their workplaces more effectively. Mainly, work satisfaction, which is one of the factors that is studied in the present research, is associated with productivity and employees’ intention to leave an organization, as supported by evidence from the study by Wu and Norman (2004). Employees choosing to leave a company has two primary effects on the business (Mashuri & Maharani, 2019; Jiang et al., 2019; Sasso et al., 2019). The first one is the need to find a replacement for this position, which requires time and efforts of the H.R. specialist, meaning that the business loses money when an employee leaves due to the need of investing in the recruitment and training of a person who will replace them. Secondly, whilst a company is looking for a replacement for the position, it also loses money and productivity since other employees have to adjust their work to account for the tasks that should have been completed by an individual who left (Abo El Nasr, 2015; Saks & Gruman, 2014). As a result, an intention to leave and employees who choose to transfer to a different organization is an issue for the businesses is an issue. Companies can address it by implementing practices that will affect factors promoting employee retention. Hence, the problem that this study investigates is linked to organizational performance, costs, and companies in the ICT sector creative, effective workplace environments where employees’ intention to leave is mitigated.

The thesis will address the problems since it will answer the ultimate question of how an ICT company’s work environment can be adjusted to suit the needs of the employees and ensure that they are committed, satisfied, and do not have any turnover intentions.

Significance of the Study

This study is significant due to its contribution to the development and enhancement of work productivity of the companies in the ICT industry. As was mentioned previously, the Mordor Intelligence (2021) report suggests that the ICT sector is among the most important ones and fastest developing sectors in the economy of the UAE. Moreover, the government emphasizes the need to support the development of this economic sector, which is why studies that investigate workplace efficiency are important for this sector and the overall economic development of the UAE (Mordor Intelligence). This study is also significant not only because of the importance of the ICT sector for the economic development of the UAE but also since businesses operate more effectively when their employees are committed, engaged, and satisfied with their work. For example, Abo El Nasr (2015) and Saks and Gruman (2014) examine the meaning and impact of human resources on the organization and argue that this is the most significant asset and that companies should invest in developing the tacit skills and knowledge, as well as on strengthening the bond between the professionals and their employer. This necessity is linked to the fact that professional skills do not mean that an individual will be working relentlessly or will engage in creative and innovative work for the benefit of the organization since they will not be motivated to do this. Moreover, research by Van Vianen (2018) suggests that there is a need to invest in hiring people whose values and views align with those of the organization because this means that the employee will understand the goals of the business and will work to ensure that the company achieves these. However, the author also notes that in most cases, the hiring decisions are the suboptimal choice between the values of the company and the individual and the latter’s skills and knowledge. This is where the importance of training and development, as well as strategies, to ensure commitment and engagement. There is evidently a link between the different organizational factors and employees’ behavior; however, the link between these elements is not well researched. The thesis will fix the issue by examining the moderation and mediation effects of the different variables.

Research Objectives and Research Questions

The objective of this research is to understand the relationship between the following variables: (Person-Environment Fit & Psychological Capital) and (Job Satisfaction & Job Engagement) and its impact on (Organizational Commitment & Intention to Stay). Moreover, this study will determine if these variables have a moderating effect on a person’s intention to stay in an organization. The goal is to provide recommendations for companies in the ICT sector understand how to manage their human resources in a way that would mitigate the employees’ intention to stay and therefore contribute to the productivity of work for the organization.

This research is guided by the following research questions:

1. What is the relationship between person-environment fit, psychological capital, job satisfaction, work engagement, organizational commitment, and intention to stay of employees in the UAE ICT Sector?
2. How does job satisfaction play a mediating role in affecting the relationship of other variables?
3. How does work engagement play a moderating role in affecting the relationship of other variables?
4. How does work satisfaction correlate with the individual’s intentions to stay in an organization?
5. How employees’ intention to stay is linked to their commitment and satisfaction with work, considering their psychological capital?

Research Gap

Table 1 below demonstrates the research gaps that characterize the existing studies on job satisfaction its moderating and mediating effects and how the present study will address these inconsistencies. Previous researchers have provided evidence of the relationships between:

1. Person-Environment Fit and Psychological Capital (Choi et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2021)
2. Person-Environment Fit and Job Satisfaction (Redelinghuys et al., 2020; Redelinghuys et al., 2019; Rocconi et al., 2020);
3. Psychological Capital and Job Satisfaction (Kun & Gadanecz, 2019; Aydin Sünbül & Aslan Gördesli, 2021; Diržytė & Perminas, 2021);
4. Job Satisfaction and Employee Engagement (Tepayakul, & Rinthaisong; Vorina et al., 2017)
5. Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment (Romi et al., 2021; Jigjiddorj et al., 2021)
6. Job Satisfaction and Intention to Stay (Jiang et al., 2019, Sasso et al., 2019, Mashuri & Maharani, 2019).

Table 1. Research gaps 

Literature Review

The literature review below will investigate the relationship between different organizational factors and their moderating effect on the job satisfaction and person’s intention to stay. As evident from the studies that will be presented, the majority of the research relevant to the topic is not recent and published more than five years ago, and none of the studies investigate the relationship between the six variables that are the focus of this research. Moreover, not many studies are dedicated specifically to the investigation of the human resource management practices pertaining to the ICT industry in the UAE, which is another research gap that this research aims to address.

Person-Environment Fit

The concept of a person-environment fit (P–E fit) is a crucial to proper business administration, particularly, the allocation of human resources. P-E fit can be identified as the extent of compatibility between an individual and the environment (Tepper et al., 2018; Xiao et al., 2021). Specifically, Andela and Van Der Doef (2018, p. 2) determine P-E fit as “the compatibility between an individual and a work environment that occurs when the characteristics are well matched.” Van Vianen (2018, p. 76) goes even further, suggesting that the specified definition should be simplified to the “compatibility between individuals and their environment.” The approach toward defining P-E fit offered by Van Vianen (2018) is quite strong, yet it could benefit from a greater nuance (Chang et al., 2020; Arias et al., 2020). In turn, Liu et al. (2019) complete the specified definition by adding the context of the work-life balance as the context in which the person-environment fit framework should be placed, thus, providing the missing perspective. Specifically, the notion of the person-environment fit implies the compatibility between a specific setting, which in the context under analysis is represented by the workplace environment, and individual characteristics such as culture, needs, social background, etc. (Mufti et al., 2019; Stich et al., 2019). The extent of compatibility between a persona and the environment determines the probability of a positive outcome (Sharf et al., 2017).

Psychological Capital

Another essential concept to be considered in relation to the subject matter, particularly, the P-E fit and the promotion of positive relationships in the workplace as the tool for enhancing the staff’s performance, psychological capital should be discussed. Darvishmotevali and Ali (2020) define psychological capital as the individual’s concern about the possible prospects that may occur in the future in regard to one’s career and the promotion opportunities (Maher et al., 2017). The specified point of view can be considered rather narrow since it involves mainly the perspective of an employee and does not allow for a comprehensive interpretation of the psychological capital, particularly, in the context of a specific organization. In turn, Tang (2020) introduces the concept of the psychological capital from a slightly broader point of view, interpreting it as an individual’s ability to apply the skills relayetd to emotional intelligence and emotional competence in order to stay motivated. Sameer (2018) contributes to the specified interpretation, confirming the importance of positivity in the workplace as a vital IE skill, similarly to Tsaur et al. (2019) and Çelik (2018). The described perspective appears to be more sensible given its potential for encompassing both the individual and the organizational standpoints on the issue of psychological capital (Gong et al., 2019; Mahfud et al., 2020). Therefore, the proposed interpretation of the psychological capital;, including the explicit knowledge and skills pertaining to the management of workplace situations derived from personal and professional experiences, needs to be deployed when addressing the issue of P-E fit. Therefore, it is vital for companies to invest in creating the environment in which staff members will be encourage and inclined to perform better (Aybas & Acar, 2017; Howard, 2017).

A recent study by Darvishmotevali and Ali (2020) investigated the effect of job insecurity, individual’s wellbeing, and their performance at work and the impact and mediating role that the psychological capital has on these factors. Mainly, job insecurity was found to have a negative effect on the person’s wellbeing and on their workplace productivity. Next, psychological capital can adversely affect job insecurity, psychological wellbeing, and work productivity (Darvishmotevali & Ali, 2020). Mainly. The idea behind this study was that an employee’s psychological capital could aid in them dealing with job insecurity, therefore resulting in their adequate wellbeing even in conditions where they do not have security. However, the findings suggest the opposite, although the limitations of this research, such as it being conducted with the hospitality industry employees, should be considered as well.

Job Satisfaction

Another critical concept that contributes to the development of a proper strategy for motivating staff members and allows building an environment in which they can succeed, job satisfaction needs further considerations. Being a rather subjective concept that depends not only on the presence of objective factors such as financial benefits, but also on a plethora of personal perceptions, the concept of job satisfaction is quite difficult to characterize (Qureshi & Hamid, 2017; Lim et al., 2017). However, multiple attempts have been made, some of the most successful being the representation of job satisfaction as “the level of contentment a person feels regarding his/her job and the sense of accomplishment he/she gets from doing it” (Sironi, 2019, p. 1724). Therefore, the notion of job satisfaction is tethered to the presence of emotional gratification that an employee receives from workplace performance. For this reason, considering job satisfaction as a critical variable in assessing the effects of P-E fit on the rates of organizational commitment and the intention to stay is necessary.

Remarkably, a range of scholars connect the concept of job satisfaction to the presence of a proper work-life balance. For example, Appelbaum et al. (2019), Prasetio et al. (2017), Kim and Yoon (2018), and Haski-Leventhal et al. (2019) insist that the described parameter is the fundamental notion in creating a positive workplace environment and ensuring that an employee feels comfortable in the organizational context. Ćulibrk et al. (2018), Demir (2020) and Abouraia and Othman (2017)also explain that job satisfaction is closely linked to the concept of organizational commitment and influences it directly, causing an increase in employee engagement and commitment with the rise in job satisfaction rates.

Work Engagement

Another essential notion that needs to be introduced in order to measure the correlation between P-E fit and the extent of organizational commitment, as well as the intention to stay, work engagement represents a major criterion.

There are several ways of approaching the notion of work engagement. Xiang et al. (2017) define work engagement as “a combination of work ability and willingness to work” (p. 240). Diniyati and Sudarma (2018) characterize work engagement by attributing the properties such as “vigor, dedication, and absorption” to it (p. 173). Although the described concepts as they pertain to the assessment of work engagement rates might seem synonymous, the researchers explain that the specified notions reflect different attitudes, specifically, the ability to focus on the job (absorption), loyalty to the company and the job (dedication), and excitement about the prospects of attaining key objectives (vigor) (Diniyati & Sudarma, 2018). Work engagement should not be confused with job satisfaction (di Stefano & Gaudiino, 2018). Representing the enthusiasm and motivation to perform (work engagement) as opposed to obtaining gratification from the obtained results (job satisfaction), work engagement requires the support of job motivation (Evitha et al., 2021). Since motivation defines the employees’ willingness to stay with the company, work engagement is vital in cementing their loyalty to the company and reducing turnover rates.

There are different definitions of employee engagement among different scholars, organizations, and different countries. The concept of employee engagement was first proposed by Kahn (1990) as the harnessing of organization members’ selves to their work roles; self-employment and self-expression of people physically, cognitively, and emotionally in their work lives (Nasurdin et al., 2018; El Junusi et al., 2021). Since Kahn proposed this concept, researchers have proposed different definitions which reflect a different understanding of employee engagement in each study, but this caused confusion for business management whether the efforts which improve employee engagement are working in all organizations (Çankır & Şahin, 2018; De Crom & Rothmann, 2018).

Kahn, William A.(1990) defined employee engagement as one who is fully absorbed by and enthusiastic about their work and so takes positive action to further the organization’s reputation and interests. Engaging employees is critical for retaining valuable talent and is an important piece of the employee satisfaction puzzle, as disengaged employees are more likely to leave their jobs (Geue, 2018). According to Forbes, employees who are engaged in their work are more likely to be motivated and remain committed to their employer (Paulise, 2020).

Organizational Commitment

When addressing the connection between the propensity among staff members to leave and the extent of P-E fit, one must also consider the issue of organizational commitment. The subject matter has been studied quite profusely lately, yet the phenomenon of organizational commitment has been defined comparatively recently. Started with the introduction of Meyer and Allen’s model of organizational commitment, the concept in question has been developed extensively in the 2000s.

Currently, the concept of organizational commitment is determined as the willingness of an individual to contribute to the development of a company and the accomplishment of its objectives, as well as the overall extent of engagement in the firm’s performance in the target market. The current study defines organizational commitment or employee commitment as the ability of the employee or staff members of the organization to stay and contribute well to their jobs for such a long term. Overall, organizational commitment can be defined as a positive feeling or commitment from employees towards their organization. Organizational commitment has three kinds, as following: emotional or affective commitment, normative commitment, continuance commitment.

Normative or ethical commitment refers to an individual’s feeling of an obligation to remain in the organization due to pressure from others, and because of moral or ethical and personal commitment to the organization and towards colleagues (Elsaearvy, 2005, 219 ).

Emotional or affective commitment indicates the strength of the individual’s desire to continue working because he or she agrees with all its goals and values, and he or she wants to participate in achieving those goals (Greenberg & Baron, 2007). Also, organizational commitment refers to the sincerity, love, and inclusion that an individual shows towards his or her work and the organization in which he or she works (Abo El Nasr, 2005, 45).

Furthermore, Continuance Commitment refers to an individual’s desire or his / her willingness to remain with the organization and to continue working in it because he or her expects that if he or her leaves work in it, it will cost him or her a great loss, meaning that continued commitment is based on the individual’s commitment to continue working in the organization as long as he or she achieves the benefits he or she needs (Greenberg & Baron, 2007, 216; Al-Madi et al., 2017).

Remarkably, the concept of organizational commitment is inherently connected to the levels of organizational performance in staff members (Lim et al., 2017). Indeed, multiple studies confirm that the rates of meeting workplace responsibilities and objectives in individuals hinge largely on the extent of organizational commitment (Nikpour, 2017). In fact, a range of researches indicate that organizational commitment represents the staff members’ extent of engagement and motivation (Al Zefeiti & Mohamad, 2017). Therefore, it will be reasonable to define the subject matter as the “degree to which an employee identifies with a particular organization and its goals and wishes to maintain membership in the organization,” as Ahad et al. (2021, p. 16) suggest. Overall, the evidence of connections between the extent of employees’ willingness to turnover and the rates of organizational commitment appears to be quite large, though further insights into the issue must be developed (Ahad et al., 2021). Specifically, both issues appear to be tied to the degree of comfort that an employee experiences when participating in workplace routine (Lambert et al., 2021). Therefore, the concept of organizational commitment needs to be seen as a vital part of the assessment of the possibility of an increase in employee turnover rates (Lambert et al., 2021). Thus, a strategy for managing the latter issue can be developed.

Intention to Stay

Intention to stay is a well-studied concept and scholars have explained it in various ways. The present study assumes that intention to stay and intention to leave are direct anthonyms, which implies that there is a direct negative correlation between intention to leave and intention to stay. As a result, all the research written about intention to leave can be applied to intetion to stay in a reversed manner.

Intention to leave is defined as an “individual’s own estimated probability (subjective) that they are permanently leaving the organization at some point in the near future” (Vandenberg & Nelson: 1999, 1315).

Intention to stay is defined as the level of an employees’ emotional attachment and commitment to an organization that prevents them from turnover (Choi et al., 2021). Dadgar et al. (2013) defined intention to stay as “the probability of the from the second half of 2007 to the end of first half of staying of the staffs in the organization with the current situation of employment” (p. 1222). Aslam and Safdar (2012) made a valuable addition to the definition of the intention to stay by stating that inention to stay is the employee’s willingness to stay with an employeer on a long-term basis.The juxtaposition of the definitions conferms the assumption that intention to leave and intention to stay are direct opposites.

While inetion to stay is a significant predictor of leaving or staying with an organization, the actual decision to leave are not exactly the same concepts, as sometimes people are forced to leave their job or stay with the current employer due to enviroenmtnal and personal factors (Dadgar et al., 2013). Therefore, there is a notable research gap in the specified area. In particular, links to P-E fit should be examined closer since they represent another gap in the current body of research.

Theoretical Framework

Each of the variables that are discussed in this study has a theoretical background, linking it to the organizational performance and employee’s attitudes towards their employers. For example, the basic theory of the fit between the person and the environment studied by Anglin et al. (2018) and Guan et al. (2021) suggest that there is a set of inherent characteristics or values that an individual has, which either align with those of the company or do not. These values predetermine the attitudes and the ability of the person to work in a specific environment, which is linked to their performance, intention to leave, and commitment, studied by Kim and Yoon (2018), Kahn (1990) and others. Ultimately, each of these factors, as shown by the research in this literature review, has an effect on how the individual performs their duties and how they perceive their organization, which are crucial for the businesses’ success in the contemporary competitive environment, where the human resources are the vital sources of advancement.

Person-Environment Fit Theory

According to a person-environment fit theory, there are reciprocal relationships between an individual and his or her environment, which means that both people and their contexts can impact each other. This theory postulates that a combination of individual resources and environmental factors identify the ability to adapt to changes (Morin, 2018). In terms of this theory, the fit between a person and environment predetermines a person’s behaviors and motivations (Anglin et al., 2018; Guan et al., 2021). This theory can be used as a theoretical framework to better understand the relationships between engagement moderating person-environment fit and job satisfaction, intention to stay, and organizational commitment, as well as job satisfaction mediating the mentioned variables (Greguras & Diefendorff, 2009).

The personality dimension can be researched in terms of the amount of employee knowledge, skills, and competencies, while the environment can be considered as corresponding skills and abilities required for the work process (Yu, 2009). For instance, the discrepancy between the value of a person as an employee and his or her firm can serve to predict the intention to stay (Greguras et al., 2014). The characteristics of the environment can include income and opportunities from its side designed to meet the needs of employees, as well as requirements for their abilities (Chuang et al., 2015). For example, the workload may not meet the employer’s requirements, also posing a threat that the employees will not meet other requirements. Another potential implication of the identified theory is assessing to what extent an employee seeks to control the pace of work and to what extent this or her control is provided by technological capabilities (Schmidt et al., 2015). The organization, in turn, can take measures to address negative aspects and increase organizational commitment through greater job satisfaction (Lee et al., 2021). For example, an organization may change its approach to recruiting, promotion, and training.

Addiionally, the P-E fit theory introduces opportunities for creating a unique adaptive mechanism for individuals based on the developmental stage at which they are facing the necessity to change and acquire resilience toward the challenges within the target environment. For instance, Shen et al. (2018) and Wang and Wang (2018) suggest modifying the P-E fit framework toward the stage-environment fit so that respective changes could be made and so that individuals could gain the confidence and prowess needed to navigate the new setting. The described approach toward the P-E fit framework invites further possibilities for promoting motivation and the subsequent increase in retention rates in staff members by creating the environment that will suit their specific needs based on the unique stage of their personal and professional development (Calzo et al., 2020). Therefore, incorporating the theoretical perspectives that will enable managers to shape the context of the workplace setting to promote positive change in the staff is vital. Moreover, the P-E fit theory introduces the chance to connect P-E fit to the concepts of employee engagement and employees’ decision to leave (Xiao et al., 2021). Namely, the theory confirms that the change in the workplace setting toward a more comfortable one, particularly, the one that meets employees’ unique needs, is conducive to an improvement in retention rates and employee motivation along with employee engagement.

Affect Theory

An affect theory by Locke (1976) is another theoretical foundation that can be used to explain the chosen framework. This theory claims that job satisfaction is largely determined by the value people to assign to the various aspects of their work, as well as the extent to which their job-related expectations are met. Morin (2018) emphasizes that the underlying argument is that an individual’s values inform his or her expectations, while the discrepancy between the anticipated benefits and reality identifies either satisfaction or dissatisfaction. Regarding the target framework, the affect theory is beneficial to explore the intention to stay, psychological capital, and person-environment fit, and organizational commitment.

The affect theory is valuable to utilize to better understand how employees identify and view their job satisfaction and associated workplace settings and changes. The key idea to be considered in future research is that the discrepancy between job requirements and an individual’s needs and abilities determines job satisfaction (Ahern, 2018). In addition, this theory states that the extent to which a person values one or another aspect of the job impacts his or her job satisfaction, while this impact can be either positive or negative. By using the affect theory as a framework, it would be possible to analyze the relationships between the identified variables in a more detailed and comprehensive manner.

Moreover, with the adoption of the affect theory, opportunities for examining the connection between motivation and the levels of employee engagement, as well as the extent of job satisfaction, emerge. Specifically, the affect theory allows connecting employees’ willingness to perform and improve to their emotional state (Ariani, 2015). As a result, a better management of employees’ engagement becomes possible (Singh, 2016). Furthermore, the affect theory suggests that, with the rise in emotional satisfaction and gratification obtained from performing workplace duties, staff members are likely to be less willing to resign (Osborne & Hammoud, 2017).

Person Environment Fit and Job Satisfaction

Previously conducted research on the relationship between these variables provides valuable insights as per the validation of the hypothesis. A meta-analysis conducted by Ahn and Lee (2019) was based on 15,589 employees whose person-environment fit was analyzed against job-related variables. The scholars integrated person-organization, and person-job fit into the first variable, and job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and intention to stay into the second variable. The findings of the study indicate that there is a strong positive relationship between person-environment fit and job satisfaction. Moreover, Redelinghuys et al. (2020), Redelinghuys et al. (2019), and Rocconi et al. (2020) validated the positive relationship between person-environment fit and job satisfaction when it is reinforced by leadership or organizational culture. Similar findings were delivered by Deschênes (2020), who identified that among the components of person-environment fit, the person-job fit was most vividly correlated with job satisfaction.

Moreover, the aspect of age influence on the relationship between the variables was addressed by Rauvola et al. (2019). This study identified that job satisfaction of older adults was more dependent on person-organization fit, while younger employees’ job satisfaction was more significantly influenced by person-job and person-group fit. A study by Gander et al. (2020) used a nationally representative sample of the employed adult population to measure the person-environment, and character strengths influence on job and life satisfaction. It was found that the stronger the character and the better the person-environment fit, the higher the level of job and life satisfaction. Furthermore, other authors concentrated on the impact of person-environment fit on job satisfaction in different fields of occupation and types of organization; the findings unanimously indicated a positive relationship between variable as found in federal employees, police officers, and project management professionals (Wang & Brower, 2018; Wang et al., 2020; White et al., 2021). Thus, the reviewed scholarly literature allows for supporting the hypothesis.

Psychological Capital and Job Satisfaction

Several studies have been found to provide information on the moderating influence of psychological capital, including optimistic worldview, self-efficacy, resilience, and family support, on job satisfaction. According to Kun and Gadanecz (2019) and Aydin Sünbül and Aslan Gördesli (2021), whose primary area of concern was the educational field and teachers’ job experience, psychological capital predetermines better job satisfaction. Valuable insight on the correlation between health outcomes and psychological money was contributed by Diržytė and Perminas (2021), who found that people with fewer health issues demonstrate a higher level of psychological wellbeing, implying better opportunities for life and job satisfaction. A similar field-focused safety-management-related research on the correlation between the two variables found a positive relationship between psychological capital and safety compliance (Ye et al., 2020). Similarly, using data collected from a female sample with the help of a self-reported questionnaire, Ganji and Johnson (2020) identified the positive effect of family support on women’s job retention and satisfaction. Furthermore, Huynh and Hua’s (2020) research on the factors influencing job satisfaction and organizational commitment using data from employees at small- and medium-sized enterprises in Vietnam found that job satisfaction and psychological wellbeing were essential determinants for job commitment.

Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment

Previous studies investigating the effect of job satisfaction on organizational commitment in various fields provide the basis for supporting the hypothesis. Indeed, according to Romi et al. (2021) and Jigjiddorj et al. (2021), higher levels of job satisfaction led to better organizational performance, compliance with corporate policies and culture, as well as a commitment to the job. Moreover, as found by Zhu et al. (2014), job satisfaction and commitment are the driving forces of sustainable organizational development; identified positive relationships between job satisfaction and loyalty were proposed for practical use. However, as found by Goujani et al. (2019), not all categories of employees as derived from the loyalty matrix have a higher commitment as a result of job satisfaction; namely, the category of hostage employees showed a low level of loyalty. Nonetheless, the positive effect has been persistent in a general population of the reviewed studies.

Job Satisfaction and Intention to Stay

As the review of previous studies suggests, lower job satisfaction triggers a higher level of likelihood os staying with an employeer. According to Jiang et al. (2019), such factors as job satisfaction, payment, workload, and others, had a negative relationship with the intentions to resign, which implies that they were positively correlated with intention to stay. Similar findings were presented by Sasso et al. (2019) and Al-Muallem and Al-Surimi (2019), who identified that an increased level of nurses’ turnover and pharmacists’ intention to leave was highly dependent on diminished job satisfaction. Moreover, study results obtained by Mashuri and Maharani (2019) support the hypothesis and indicate a positive relationships between intention to stay and job satisfaction level. Since previous research findings provide relevant, verifiable, and credible data on the correlation between job satisfaction and the likelihood to to stay with an employeer, the following hypothesis was formed.

Engagement Moderating Person-Environment Fit and Job Satisfaction

One might assert that engagement moderates the relationship of dependence between the independent variable of person-environment fit and the dependent variable of job satisfaction based on the anticipated increased value of person-environment fit under the influence of engagement, which will ultimately affect job satisfaction, increasing it. Accordingly, managers can promote fit between jobs and employees to achieve organizational fit and improve job satisfaction. The awareness of managers of the moderating effect of engagement can serve as the foundation for implementing practical actions in terms of organizational design, as well as employee socialization and retention. However, person environment fit is not to be considered as a general agenda, but regarding fit perceptions, thus supporting employees on their developmental trajectories (Wang et al., 2020). By remaining aware of person-environment fit and job satisfaction dependence, managers can successfully regulate the organizational mechanisms.

The evidence regards personal resources as predictors of job satisfaction, but scholars do not consider job engagement as a mediator of productivity and job satisfaction (Redelinghuys et al., 2019); Rocconi et al., 2020). Moreover, the range of psychological phenomena that correlate with work engagement or pretend to be prerequisites is wide enough, and their role is not clearly defined. For example, self-efficacy is associated with enthusiasm, and it can be both a prerequisite and an effect. Perhaps employees with more resilience are more capable of remaining interested in work and ready to overcome various difficulties in work, which correlates with resilience as a personal resource. Therefore, an in-depth understanding of engagement as a moderator requires additional theoretical and empirical testing that can be conducted in the future studies.

Engagement Moderating Psychological Capital and Job Satisfaction

A positive change in the value of psychological capital, as an independent variable, will result in the consecutive positive change in the dependent variable, job satisfaction. Engagement, as a moderator in the causal relationship between the independent variable and dependent variable, might either increase or decrease their relationship. In this case, engagement can be regarded as a stable and deep emotional and motivational state affecting various mental processes, which does not focus on any specific object or form of behavior, but describe an employee’s attitude to work in general. It provides resources, such as physical, social, and organizational aspects, which help to facilitate work requirements associated with high psychophysiological and psychological costs (Kun & Gadanecz, 2019). For example, conflict resolution, overtime work, and stress are moderated through a high degree of engagement, which is essential to achieve the set work goals and stimulate the personal and professional growth of employees.

There is a need to investigate engagement as a moderator between psychological capital and job satisfaction. In particular, since the psychological capital is a resource of socio-psychological relations, due to which an employee is able to successfully achieve the intended goals, one should discover the connection between both dimensions. Despite the fact that both variables function in different ways in terms of a person’s job-related attitudes and behaviors, they should have the same result, such as an increase in the quality of a person’s work, therefore, a rise in job satisfaction (Aydin Sünbül & Aslan Gördesli, 2021). Moreover, the ability of engagement to either improve or deteriorate job satisfaction caused by psychological capital specifics is critical to study to gain the awareness of the issues to integrate or avoid in a workplace.

Engagement Moderating Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment

Since engagement is not a causal result of job satisfaction, it moderates the relationship between independent (job satisfaction) and dependent (organizational commitment) variables. There is a need to explore the relationships between organizational commitment and job satisfaction in the context of employee performance and engagement. Moral considerations compose one of the components of employee engagement. On the one hand, a satisfied employee is more likely to feel a moral obligation to act loyally to the company. On the other hand, the continuity obligation expresses the concept that the commitment to work is dependent on the balance of costs and benefits for a certain employee. Future research is necessary to identify various methods and strategies to increase organizational commitment through improving the job satisfaction of employees. These include strategies in which employees can work together in a way that creates a strong bond. Those who feel a strong attachment and connection to the workplace demonstrate a higher level of commitment to the organization (Jigjiddorj et al., 2021; Romi et al., 2021). Based on the results obtained, a number of recommendations for the development of employee commitment can be made.

Engagement Moderating Job Satisfaction and Intention to Stay

Past studies indicate that there is a correlation between the levels of engagement and, therefore, the willingness of an employee to stay. Specifically, the hypothesis concerning high engagement rates being correlated postively with job satisfaction and intention to stay is supported by the studies by Warr and Inceoglu (2012) and Skaalvik and Skaalvik (2014). However, the current body of knowledge indicates that there is a gap in the analysis of the subject matter. Furthermore, Kassing et al. (2012) also insists on the connection between employee engagement and the intention to stay by pointing out that low levels of motivation negatively affect intention to stay.

Since there is a positive relationship between job satisfaction and intention to stay, the value of engagement as a moderator between independent (job satisfaction) and dependent (intention to stay) variables will predetermine the relationship between the variables. It is important to identify the role of engagement in the impact of low job satisfaction on an employee’s search behavior, which the degree of his or her activity in looking for alternatives and considering proposals for other jobs. An unsuccessful search for alternatives positively affects the employee’s intention to stay in the organization, and a successful one strengthens the intention to leave (Mashuri & Maharani, 2019). Future research should be devoted to comprehensively considering organizational and personal factors that determine the departure or continuation of work in the organization. In particular, a hypothesis is that low job satisfaction negatively correlates with the intention to stay because of an unfavorable psychological atmosphere in the workplace, the tension in professional responsibilities, and dissatisfaction with the leadership, which determine the extent of engagement (Choi et al., 2021).

In turn, increased attention to workplace relationships, stress at work, and comfort for the employee is a characteristic feature of this issue, which allows assuming that an organization can influence the decision of employees to stay, creating a favorable atmosphere aimed at retention of employees in the company and developing a sense of organizational citizenship in employees (Jiang et al., 2019). The stimulation of their engagement in the life of the company can be explored based on care demonstration, provision with access to timely and relevant information, and training in the workplace.

H8: Engagement as a moderator predetermines the relationships between job satisfaction and the intention to stay an organization.

Job Satisfaction Mediating Person Environment Fit and Organization Commitment

Since there is a positive relationship between person-environment fit and organizational commitment, job satisfaction might be regarded a mediator between the variables. This is because as was discussed in the literature review, the person-environment fit theory and commitment are pertaining to the individual’s choice of a suboptimal workplace that would align with their values and expectations. However, the extent of one’s job satisfaction may affect the person’s overall perception of their work and therefore mediate their view. The connection between the levels of P-E fit, organizational commitment, and the presence of job satisfaction in staff members has also been addressed in the studies by Ahmad (2012) and Gul et al. (2018) correspondingly. Mentioning the specified variables in tandem, the authors indicate that there is a link between them, yet further correlation is to be examined more closely. Thus, a notable research gap can be observed.

H9: There is a positive impact of job satisfaction as a mediator on person-environment fit (an independent variable), resulting in organizational commitment (a dependent variable) since a satisfied workforce is more likely to perform optimally and remain loyal to an organization.

Job Satisfaction Mediating Person-Environment Fit and Intention to Stay

Job satisfaction is a mediator in the P-E fit and intention to stay relationship since P-E fit predetermines job satisfaction, which ultimately affects intention to leave (Anglin et al., 2018; Guan et al., 2021). The relationship between these variables is linked to an individual selecting an environment for work where they will be satisfied with the work conditions and the perspectives and therefore, their intention to look for a different position should be low (Anglin et al., 2018; Guan et al., 2021). Specifically, papers by Ahmad (2012) and Shah et al. (2015) confirm that job satisfaction has an influence on the P-E fit levels, as well as the willingness to retire.

H10: There is a positive relationship between a high P-E fit (an independent variable) and intention to stay (a dependent variable) as job satisfaction mediates a P-E fit as a dominant force in one’s career.

Job Satisfaction Mediating Psychological Capital and Organization Commitment

Job satisfaction is a mediator between psychological capital and organizational commitment due to the dependence of job satisfaction on psychological capital, which generates organizational commitment (Romi et al., 2021; Jigjiddorj et al., 2021). The exploration of this variable is especially interesting since the literature review suggests that in some industries, psychological capital does not affect satisfaction and with one’s work and organizational commitment.

H11: There is a mediating role of job satisfaction regarding psychological capital (an independent variable), the amount of which impacts the level of organizational commitment (a dependent variable).

Job Satisfaction Mediating Psychological Capital and Intention to Leave

The mediating effect of job satisfaction on psychological capital and intention to leave is validated by the dependence of job satisfaction on psychological capital; job satisfaction level predetermines intention to leave (Jiang et al., 2019, Sasso et al., 2019, Mashuri & Maharani, 2019). This mediating effect will help understand whether one’s psychological capital strengthens a person’s intention to leave an organization or vice versa, where it supports there decision to work in an environment where their satisfaction with work is low.

H12: Job satisfaction as a mediator enriches psychological capital (an independent variable), which reduces the intention to leave (a dependent variable) since having meaningful job experiences is attractive to employees.

Conceptual Framework

In the light of the previous research studies , the research statement and the research concepts it can be introduced the following conceptual framework which determines the research variable as shown in Figure 1.

Specifically, Fig. 1 points to the correlation between the extent of moderation and the rates of mediation. Namely, the extent of engagement rates in employees, among other factors, appears to be affected heavily by the presence of motivation. More importantly, the connection between P-E fit and the extent of psychological capital in the organizational setting appear to be in direct correlation to each other, as Fig. 1 shows. Furthermore, the correlation and causation between P-E fit and the increase in psychological capital appears to be mostly confirmed, as the table below illustrates. Specifically, due to the development of the approach to managing the human resources in the way that allows them to be placed in the setting where they feel most comfortable, the opportunities for avoiding conflicts, misunderstandings, mismanagement of information, and the related issues can be created ().

Indicators

Indicators of Person Environment Fit in the Current Study:

1. Person–Organization Fit
2. Person–Job Fit
3. Person–Group Fit
4. Person–Person Fit

Indicators of Psychological Capital in the Current Study:

1. Self-Efficacy
2. Optimism
3. Hope
4. Resilience

Indicators of Job Satisfaction in the Current Study:

1. Salary and incentives
2. Work Relations
3. Employment empowerment
4. Physical work environment

Indicators of work relations in the current study, for example:

1. Work relations with colleagues
2. Work relations with superiors
3. Work relations with subordinates
4. Work relationships with clients or with public.

Indicators of Employee Engagement in the Current Study:

1. Vigor
2. Dedication
3. Absorption

Indicators of Organizational Commitment in the Current Study:

1. Emotional or Affective Commitment
2. Normative or Ethical Commitment
3. Continued Commitment

Emotional or Affective Commitment:

1. Phrases of emotional or affective commitment in the current study, for example:
   1. I have a strong feeling of belonging to that organization for which I work.
   2. I feel emotionally attached to this organization.
   3. I feel like a family member of that organization.
   4. I would be very happy if I spend the rest of my life working in this organization.

Normative or Ethical Commitment:

1. Phrases of normative or ethical loyalty job in the current study, for example:
   1. I feel obligated to stay in the organization due to pressure from others.
   2. I feel compelled to stay in the organization in order not to leave a bad impression on my colleagues because I left my work.
   3. I have a moral and personal obligation to remain in this organization.
   4. This organization has a merit over me, and it is not ethical in general and work ethics to leave work in this organization.

Continued Commitment:

1. Phrases of job satisfaction in the current study, for example:
   1. I see the need to continue working in this organization.
   2. Working in this organization brings many benefits to me.
   3. Leaving this organization is costing me a lot.
   4. I need to continue with this organization because I cannot bear the burden of living otherwise.

Indicators of Intention to Stay in the Current Study:

1. Employee’s perception of organization support
2. Employee’s perception of organization commitment
3. Employee’s perception of job satisfaction
4. Employee’s perception of job engagement

Methodology

A quantitative approach is the most appropriate method for the present study. According to Abo El Nasr and Medhat (2017), the use of quantitative research s appropriate when a researcher needs to test a hypothesis. In contrast, qualitative research aims to gain a better understanding of a problem or a phenomenon that has not been clearly defined (Saunders et al., 2019). Qualitative studies to identify problems in the general area of interest for future research to focus on specific issues (Copper & Schindler, 2014). Quantitative research is usually based on the results of qualitative research and provides specific answers to narrow questions (Saunders et al., 2019).

A quantitative approach is associated with the analysis of numeric data, while a qualitative approach relies on non-structured data (Copper & Schindler, 2014). Thus, quantitative research relies on surveys as the primary source of data, while qualitative studies collect data through interviews, focus groups, and observations (Saunders et al., 2019).

A quantitative approach is a more appropriate approach, as it requires a clearly formulated research and rigorous methodology aimed at testing the identified hypotheses Copper & Schindler, 2014). A mixed-method approach was considered as an alternative to using qualitative data only. However, it was decided against using a mixed-method approach due to the redundancy of information. A mixed-method approach is usually used when a researcher needs to explain the qualitative results (Copper & Schindler, 2014). The purpose of this research is to increase the generalizability of previous findings. The explanations have already been given by previous studies, as demonstrated in the literature review.

Instruments

A total of eight instruments will be used to measure the variables. The first instrument will include four questions about general demographical characteristics, including age, gender, marital status, and education level. The second instrument will provide information concerning job data. A self-crated questionnaire will be used. Third, the Perceived Person-Environment Fit Scale (PPEFS) will be used to measure P-E fit. It is a 19-item questionnaire based on a seven-point Likert scale (Chuang et al., 2015). Fourth, a modified Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ) will be used for measuring Psychological capital. Instead of 24 questions in the original PCQ, the modified version will have only 23 questions (Luthans, 2007).

Fifth, the Organizational Commitment Questionnaire will be used to measure organizational commitment (Mowday, 1979). It is a high-validity instrument based on a seven-point Likert scale. Sixth, a short for of Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ) will be used to measure job satisfaction (Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire, n.d.). The questionnaire contains 20 questions based on a five-point Likert scale. Seventh, work Engagement will be measured Work and Well-Being Survey (UWES). It is a 17-question questionnaire also based on a five-point Likert scale (Schaufeli & Bakker, 2004). Finally, intention to stay will be measured using the Michigan Organizational Assessment Package, consisting of three questions (Survey Research Center, 1975). A reversed scale will be used to measure the variable, as the questionnaire is intended to measure the intention to leave.

In summary, the total number of questions in all instruments is 95, which implies that a participant will need approximately 20 minutes to finish the survey. All the instruments have high validity, confirmed by numerous research. Thus, the instruments used for the present study are a significant strength.

Sampling

The population under the analysis of the present research includes all employees of the ICT sector in the UAE. In other words, the population includes the employees of the Telecommunications Regulatory Authority and Digital Government (TRADG), Etisalat, and du. The information about the number of employees of the TRADG is not provided in the open-source; however, it was estimated that the current number of employees in the governing body is 1,000. The current number of employees of Etisalat is 43,000 (Owler, 2021). In 2018, the approximate number of du’s employees was 4,000 (du, 2019). Thus, the total size of the population under analysis is estimated at 48,000.

The sample size was estimated to be 119 using the formula provided by Cochran (1977). The formula, assumptions, and calculations are provided below.

Where:

• t = t-value corresponding to the alpha level;
• s = standard deviation in the population;
• d = acceptable margin of error for mean being estimated.

The selected margin of error was 3%, as it appears appropriate for the studies of such purpose (Cochran, 1977). Thus, the acceptable margin of error of the mean being estimated can be calculated by multiplying the seven-point scale by the margin of error. Standard deviation was estimated by dividing the full point scale by the range. Since a 7-point scale is used for the majority of measurements, the range is 6, and the estimated standard deviation is 1.167. Thus, the sample size can be calculated the following way:

Stratified sampling was used to recruit participants. Stratified sampling is a random sampling method that aims at recruiting an unbiased sample of participants from all the groups present in a population (Saunders et al., 2019). In order to use the stratified sampling method, a researcher needs to divide the total population into strata by using simple probability sampling in each of the strata (Abo El Nasr & Medhat, 2017). The benefit of stratified sampling is that it guarantees that all the subgroups of the population will be represented in the sample appropriately.

At first, it was considered to use simple random sampling; however, it was decided that the method would lead to increased bias. The problem with simple random sampling is that it can overrepresent some subgroups in the population (Cohran, 1977). Stratified sampling provides better precision than simple random sampling, it is more cost-effective and can allow the analysis of separate subgroups (Cohran, 1977). The population under analysis consists of employees from three organizations. Thus, it would be appropriate to make a stratum out of every organization.

Data Collection Procedure

Data will be collected using online questionnaires. The employees will be recruited using internal emails of employees. The researcher will contact the HR departments of three organizations using email and phone calls. The HR department will be explained the purpose of the study and ask to provide a list of personal emails of the employees. After that, recruitment letters will be sent to the employees with explanations of the research and an informed consent form. The email will contain a link to Survey Monkey, an online surveying platform that allows easy and secure primary data collection.

All the collected information will be stored on Survey Monkey’s server. As soon as the required number of responses is acquired, the data collection procedure will be stopped. All the information will be downloaded to a laptop protected by a password. The collected information will not contain any personal data as an additional measure of protection. After the data is downloaded, it will be cleaned and analyzed using the methods described below.

Data Anlaysis Methods

The data will be analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25. The primary statistical methods will include descriptive statistics to understand the basic characteristics of the sample, Pearson’s correlation analysis, and regression analysis. Additionally, a total of 4 mediation and moderation models will be created using Hayes’s (2013) PROCESS macro for SPSS. A significance level of 0.05 will be used for all statistical tests. The results will be interpreted and compared to the current body of knowledge.

Work Plan and Timetable

It is important to develop a work plan that identifies specific activities that will be carried out in the study. The work plan helps in breaking down the entire project into specific tasks that should be completed within a specific time. The following Gantt chart identifies these activities and the timeline within which they should be completed. As shown in the table, all the activities should be completed by the end of May/June 2021.

Conclusion

Since most aspects of work are intertwined and are affected by each other, directly or indirectly, positively or negatively, and to a high, medium, or low degree, we believe that most aspects of work are intertwined and are affected by each other in the vast majority of matters. Similarly, we notice that science analysis on today’s organizations focuses on the analysis of certain variables, in order to determine the form and degree of interrelationships within these variables, and we discover that these variables are interrelated and overlap.

In summary, this paper is a research proposal that describes a mixed-method study focusing on the different organizational factors that affect the attitudes and work performance of the individuals employed in the ICT sector in the UAE. Hence, the goal of this study is to examine the interconnection of the different variables and their moderating and mediating effect on one another. The anticipated outcome is the ability to draw conclusions regarding how businesses can structure their organizational environments and HR practices to ensure that their employees work productively, receive effective training that makes these human resources a valuable asset and a competitive advantage, and stay with the company. These outcomes will be specific to the ICT industry in the UAE because it is a growing economic sector and the priority for the economic development set by the state’s government. Therefore, this study will contribute significantly to the business activity development in the UAE and will help businesses.

The possible future gaps include the difference in the importance of the different factors since this study will not examine the specific level of impact that the six variables have on the organizational outcomes and employee’s work. Moreover, future research can use the theoretical model and framework developed in this paper to study the six factors in question-based on different industries or even states. This is because the culture of the UAE differs from that in the West or Asia, and the employees’ attitudes and perceptions may vary greatly depending on the social context that they live and work in, which means that the conclusions of this study may be not applicable to these environments.

References

Abdullah, R., Musa, M., Zahari, H., Rahman, R., & Khalid, K. (2011). The study of employee satisfaction and its effects towards loyalty in hotel industry in Klang Valley, Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(3), 147-155.

Abo El Nasr, & Medhat, M. (2005). Organizational commitment. Etrac for Publication.

Abo El Nasr, & Medhat, M., (2015). Human resources management. Nile Group for Publication.

Abo El Nasr, & Medhat, M., (2017). Methods of scientific research. Arab Group for Publication.

Abouraia, M. K., & Othman, S. M. (2017). Transformational leadership, job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and turnover intentions: the direct effects among bank representatives. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 7(04), 404-424.

Ahad, R., Mustafa, M. Z., Mohamad, S., Abdullah, N. H. S., & Nordin, M. N. (2021). Work attitude, organizational commitment and emotional intelligence of malaysian vocational college teachers. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 13(1), 15-21.

Ahern, S. (2018). Affect theory and literary critical practice. Springler.

Ahmad, K. Z. (2012). The mediating effect of person-environment fit on the relationship between organisational culture and job satisfaction. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 4(1), 91.

Ahn, J. D., & Lee, D. Y. (2019). The relationships between person-environment fit and job-related variables. Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 32(2), 107–134. Web.

Aizzat, M. N., Ramayah, T., Mohamad, A. H., & Seow, L. V. (2003). Job satisfaction and turnover intentions: A study among academicians. In The Proceedings of the 5th Asian Academy of Management Conference,“Challenges of Globalized Business: The Asian Perspective”, 10th–13th September (p. 2003).

Al Zefeiti, S. M. B., & Mohamad, N. A. (2017). The Influence of organizational commitment on Omani public employees’ work performance. International Review of Management and Marketing, 7(2), 151-160.

Al-Madi, F. N., Assal, H., Shrafat, F., & Zeglat, D. (2017). The impact of employee motivation on organizational commitment. European Journal of Business and Management, 9(15), 134-145.

Al-Muallem, N., & Al-Surimi, K. M. (2019). Job satisfaction, work commitment and intention to leave among pharmacists: A cross-sectional study. BMJ Open, 9(9).

Andela, M., & van der Doef, M. (2019). A comprehensive assessment of the person–environment fit dimensions and their relationships with work-related outcomes. Journal of Career Development, 46(5), 567-582.

Anglin, A., Short, J., Drover, W., Stevenson, R., McKenny, A., & Allison, T. (2018). The power of positivity? The influence of positive psychological capital language on crowdfunding performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(4), 470-492.

Appelbaum, N. P., Lee, N., Amendola, M., Dodson, K., & Kaplan, B. (2019). Surgical resident burnout and job satisfaction: The role of workplace climate and perceived support. Journal of Surgical Research, 234, 20-25.

Ariani, D. W. (2015). Relationship with supervisor and co-workers, psychological condition and employee engagement in the workplace. Journal of Business and Management, 4(3), 34-47.

Arias, V. B., Amor, A. M., Verdugo, M. A., Fernández, M., Arias, B., & Aza, A. (2020). Toward a Better “Person–Environment Fit” through Items Calibration of the SIS-C. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(10), 3471.

Aslam, M. S., & Safdar, U. (2012). The influence of job burnout on intention to stay in the organization: mediating role of affective commitment. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2(4), 4016-4025.

Aybas, M., & Acar, A. C. (2017). The effect of hrm practices on employees’ work engagement and the mediating and moderating role of positive psychological capital. International Review of Management and Marketing, 7(1), 363-372.

Aydin Sünbül, Z., & Aslan Gördesli, M. (2021). Psychological capital and job satisfaction in public-school teachers: The mediating role of prosocial behaviours. Journal of Education for Teaching, 47(2), 147–162.

Calzo, J. P., Poteat, V. P., Yoshikawa, H., Russell, S. T., & Bogart, L. M. (2020). Person‐environment fit and positive youth development in the context of high school gay–straight alliances. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 30, 158-176.

Çankır, B., & Şahin, S. (2018). Psychological well-being and job performance: the mediating role of work engagement. Hitit University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 11(3), 2549-2560.

Çelik, M. (2018). The effect of psychological capital level of employees on workplace stress and employee turnover intention. Innovar, 28(68), 67-75.

Chang, C. M., Liu, L. W., Hsieh, H. H., & Chen, K. C. (2020). A multilevel analysis of organizational support on the relationship between person-environment fit and performance of university physical education teachers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(6), article 2041.

Chen, C. L., & Chen, M. H. (2021). Hospitality Industry Employees’ Intention to Stay in Their Job after the COVID-19 Pandemic. Administrative Sciences, 11(4), 144-154.

Choi, W., Noe, R., & Cho, Y. (2019). What is responsible for the psychological capital-job performance relationship? An examination of the role of informal learning and person-environment fit. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 35(1), 28-41.

Chuang, A., Hsu, R. S., Wang, A. C., & Judge, T. A. (2015). Does West “fit” with East? In search of a Chinese model of person–environment fit. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2), 480-510.

Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Cooper, D. R, & Schindler, P. S. (2014) Business research methods. McGraw-Hill Education.

Ćulibrk, J., Delić, M., Mitrović, S., & Ćulibrk, D. (2018). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment and job involvement: The mediating role of job involvement. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, article 132.

Dadgar, H., Barahouei, F., Mohammadi, M., Ebrahimi, M., & Ganjali, A. (2013). The relationship between organizational culture, job satisfaction, organizational commitment and intention to stay of health personnel’s of Zahedan University of Medical Sciences. World Applied Sciences Journal, 21(8), 1220-1228.

Darvishmotevali, M., & Ali, F. (2020). Job insecurity, subjective well-being and job performance: The moderating role of psychological capital. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 87, 102462.

De Crom, N., & Rothmann, S. (2018). Demands–abilities fit, work beliefs, meaningful work and engagement in nature-based jobs. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 44(1), 1-12.

Demir, S. (2020). The role of self-efficacy in job satisfaction, organizational commitment, motivation and job involvement. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 20(85), 205-224.

Deschênes, A.-A. (2020). Satisfaction with work and person–environment fit: Are there intergenerational differences? An examination through person–job, person–group and person–supervisor fit. International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior, 24(1), 60–75.

Di Stefano, G., & Gaudiino, M. (2018). Differential effects of workaholism and work engagement on the interference between life and work domains. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 14(4), 863-879.

Diniyati, L., & Sudarma, K. (2018). The effect of meaning of work and psychological empowerment on affective commitment with work engagement as an intervening variable. Management Analysis Journal, 7(2), 171-179.

Diržytė, A., & Perminas, A. (2021). Selfreported health-related experiences, psychological capital, and psychological wellbeing in Lithuanian adults sample. Health Psychology Open, 8(1), 205510292199616.

Du. (2019). Annual report. Web.

Eknath, S. & Gadekar, D. (2020). Level of human resources development – A conceptual and review exposition. International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology, 8, 687-691.

El Junusi, R., Widarno, B., & Mubarok, F. K. (2021). Building the relationship of islamic transglobal leadership with human resource performance through a meaningful work, engagement, and creativity. International Journal of Economics & Management, 15(2), 175-190.

Elsaearvy, M. (2005). Organizational Behavior. Hores for Publishing.

Evitha, Y., Vikaliana, R., Sapta, A., & Abdul, F. W. (2021). Description and causes of having work engagement in employees. Ilomata International Journal of Management, 2(3), 206-215.

Gander, F., Hofmann, J., & Ruch, W. (2020). Character strengths: Person–environment fit and relationships with job and life satisfaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, article 1582.

Ganji, S. F., & Johnson, L. W. (2020). The relationship between family emotional support, psychological capital, female job satisfaction and turnover intention. International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Studies, 7(1), 59–70.

Geue, P. E. (2018). Positive practices in the workplace: Impact on team climate, work engagement, and task performance. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 54(3), 272-301.

Gong, Z., Chen, Y., & Wang, Y. (2019). The influence of emotional intelligence on job burnout and job performance: Mediating effect of psychological capital. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, article 2707.

Goujani, A. J., Shahin, A., Isfahani, A. N., & Safari, A. (2019). Analyzing the influence of job satisfaction on hostage employee loyalty in Isfahan Province Gas Company. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 26(6), 1728-1748.

Greenberg, Jerald & Baron, Robert, (2007). Behaivor In Organization. Prentice Hall Int. limited.

Greguras, G. J., & Diefendorff, J. M. (2009). Different fits satisfy different needs: Linking person-environment fit to employee commitment and performance using self-determination theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 465.

Greguras, G. J., Diefendorff, J. M., Carpenter, J., & Tröster, C. (2014). Person-environment fit and self-determination theory. In The Oxford Handbook of Work Engagement, Motivation, and Self-Determination Theory (143-161). OUP.

Guan, Y., Deng, H., Fan, L., & Zhou, X. (2021). Theorizing person-environment fit in a changing career world: Interdisciplinary integration and future directions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 126, 103557.

Guzeller, C. O., & Celiker, N. (2019). Examining the relationship between organizational commitment and turnover intention via a meta-analysis. International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research, 14(1), 102-120.

Gul, H., Usman, M., Liu, Y., Rehman, Z., & Jebran, K. (2018). Does the effect of power distance moderate the relation between person environment fit and job satisfaction leading to job performance? Evidence from Afghanistan and Pakistan. Future Business Journal, 4(1), 68-83.

Haski-Leventhal, D., Kach, A., & Pournader, M. (2019). Employee need satisfaction and positive workplace outcomes: The role of corporate volunteering. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 48(3), 593-615.

Hayes, A. F. (2013). Methodology in the social sciences. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression based approach. Guilford Press.

Howard, M. C. (2017). The empirical distinction of core self-evaluations and psychological capital and the identification of negative core self-evaluations and negative psychological capital. Personality and Individual Differences, 114, 108-118.

Huynh, T. N., & Hua, N. T. (2020). The relationship between task-oriented leadership style, psychological capital, job satisfaction and organizational commitment: Evidence from Vietnamese small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 17(4), 583–604.

ITU News. (2011). ICT in the United Arab Emirates. ITU. Web.

Jiang, F., Zhou, H., Rakofsky, J., Hu, L., Liu, T., Wu, S., Lie, H., Liu, Y., & Tang, Y. (2019). Intention to leave and associated factors among psychiatric nurses in China: A nationwide cross-sectional study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 94, 159–165.

Jigjiddorj, S., Zanabazar, A., Jambal, T., & Semjid, B. (2021). Relationship between organizational culture, employee satisfaction and organizational commitment. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 90, p. 02004). EDP Sciences.

Kahn, William A (1990). Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724.

Kassing, J. W., Piemonte, N. M., Goman, C. C., & Mitchell, C. A. (2012). Dissent expression as an indicator of work engagement and intention to leave. The Journal of Business Communication (1973), 49(3), 237-253.

Kim, H. L., & Yoon, S. H. (2018). Effects of group rational emotive behavior therapy on the nurses’ job stress, burnout, job satisfaction, organizational commitment and turnover intention. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 48(4), 432-442.

Kun, A., & Gadanecz, P. (2019). Workplace happiness, wellbeing and their relationship with psychological capital: A study of Hungarian teachers. Current Psychology, 1-15.

Lambert, E. G., Leone, M., Hogan, N. L., Buckner, Z., Worley, R., & Worley, V. B. (2021). To be committed or not: A systematic review of the empirical literature on organizational commitment among correctional staff. Criminal Justice Studies, 34(1), 88-114.

Lee, J., Jin, M. H., & Ryu, G. (2021). Motivated to share? Using the person–environment fit theory to explain the link between public service motivation and knowledge sharing. Sustainability, 13(11), article 6286.

Lim, A. J. P., Loo, J. T. K., & Lee, P. H. (2017). The impact of leadership on turnover intention: The mediating role of organizational commitment and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 1(1), 27-41.

Liu, P., Wang, X., Li, A., & Zhou, L. (2019). Predicting work–family balance: A new perspective on person–environment fit. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, article 1804.

Locke, Edwin.A., (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M.D. Dunnette (ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp.1297-1349). Rand McNally.

Luthans F., Youssef, C.M., & Avolio, B. J. (2007) Psychological Capital. Oxford University Press.

Maher, A., Mahmoud, H. S., & El Hefny, S. (2017). Authentic leadership and psychological capital: The impact on Egyptian employees’ work well being. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(3), 204-212.

Mahfud, T., Triyono, M. B., Sudira, P., & Mulyani, Y. (2020). The influence of social capital and entrepreneurial attitude orientation on entrepreneurial intentions: the mediating role of psychological capital. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 26(1), 33-39.

Mashuri, N. A., & Maharani, D. P. (2019). The relationship of staff job satisfaction and intention to leave at a hospital. Jurnal Administrasi Kesehatan Indonesia, 7(1), 81-88.

Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ) Short Form (n.d.). Web.

Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14(2), 224–247.

Mordor Intelligence. (2021). Analysis of the telecom sector in the United Arab Emirates (2008-2020) – growth, trends, covid-19 impact, and forecasts (2021 – 2026). Web.

Mufti, M., Pudjiarti, E., & Darmanto, S. (2019). Analysis of second order person-environment fit on innovative work behavior and individual performance. Arthatama, 3(2), 100-113.

Nasurdin, A. M., Ling, T. C., & Khan, S. N. (2018). Linking social support, work engagement and job performance in nursing. International Journal of Business & Society, 19(2), 363-386.

Nikpour, A. (2017). The impact of organizational culture on organizational performance: The mediating role of employee’s organizational commitment. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 6, 65-72.

Osborne, S., & Hammoud, M. S. (2017). Effective employee engagement in the workplace. International Journal of Applied Management and Technology, 16(1), 50-67.

Owler. (2021). Etisalat. Web.

Paulise, L. (2020). How employee engagement fluctuations impact company outcomes in Covid-19 times. Forbes. Web.

Prasetio, A. P., Yuniarsih, T., & Ahman, E. (2017). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and organizational citizenship behaviour in state-owned banking. Universal Journal of Management, 5(1), 32-38.

Qureshi, M. A., & Hamid, K. (2017). Impact of supervisor support on job satisfaction: A moderating role of fairness perception. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(3), 235-242.

Rauvola, R. S., Rudolph, C. W., Ebbert, L. K., & Zacher, H. (2020). Person–environment fit and work satisfaction: Exploring the conditional effects of age. Work, Aging and Retirement, 6(2), 101-117.

Redelinghuys, K., Rothmann, S., & Botha, E. (2019). Workplace flourishing: Measurement, antecedents and outcomes. S.A. Journal of Industrial Psychology, 45.

Redelinghuys, K., Rothmann, S., & Botha, E. (2020). Outcomes of leader empowering behaviour in a retail organisation. South African Journal of Business Management, 51(1), 1-11.

Rocconi, L. M., Liu, X., & Pike, G. R. (2020). The impact of person-environment fit on grades, perceived gains, and satisfaction: An application of Holland’s Replication theory. Higher Education, 80(5), 857–874.

Romi, M., Soetjipto, N., Widaningsih, S., Manik, E., & Riswanto, A. (2021). Enhancing organizational commitment by exploring job satisfaction, organizational citizenship behavior and emotional intelligence. Management Science Letters, 11(3), 917-924.

Saks, A. M., & Gruman, J. A. (2014). What do we really know about employee engagement?. Human resource development quarterly, 25(2), 155-182.

Sameer, Y. M. (2018). Innovative behavior and psychological capital: Does positivity make any difference? Journal of Economics & Management, 32, 75-101.

Sasso, L., Bagnasco, A., Catania, G., Zanini, M., Aleo, G., & Watson, R. (2019). Push and pull factors of nurses’ intention to leave. Journal of Nursing Management, 27(5), 946–954.

Saunders, M. N. K., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019) Research methods for business students. Pearson.

Schmidt, J. A., Chapman, D. S., & Jones, D. A. (2015). Does emphasizing different types of person–environment fit in online job ads influence application behavior and applicant quality? Evidence from a field experiment. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(2), 267-282.

Shah, A. A. S. H. A., Deen, K. A., & Szabist, I. (2015). The effect of person-environment fit on turnover intentions of employees with the mediating role of job satisfaction in banking sector of Pakistan. European Journal of Business and Management, 7(31), 47-59.

Schaufeli, W. & Bakker, A. (2004). UWES Utrecht Work Engagement Scale: Preliminary manual. Occupational Health Psychology Unit Utrecht University. Web.

Shen, X. L., Li, Y. J., Sun, Y., & Zhou, Y. (2018). Person-environment fit, commitment, and customer contribution in online brand community: A nonlinear model. Journal of Business Research, 85, 117-126.

Singh, R. (2016). The impact of intrinsic and extrinsic motivators on employee engagement in information organizations. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 57(2), 197-206.

Sironi, E. (2019). Job satisfaction as a determinant of employees’ optimal well-being in an instrumental variable approach. Quality & Quantity, 53(4), 1721-1742.

Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2014). Teacher self-efficacy and perceived autonomy: Relations with teacher engagement, job satisfaction, and emotional exhaustion. Psychological reports, 114(1), 68-77.

Smith, S. C. (Ed.). (2018). Ensuring research integrity and the ethical management of data. IGI Global.

Stich, J. F., Tarafdar, M., Stacey, P., & Cooper, S. C. (2019). Appraisal of email use as a source of workplace stress: A person-environment fit approach. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 20(2), 2.

Survey Research Center. (1975). Michigan Organizational assessment package. Institute for Social Research The University of Michigan. Web.

Tang, J. J. (2020). Psychological capital and entrepreneurship sustainability. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 866.

TDRA. (n.d.). ICT discovery brief. Web.

Tepayakul, R., & Rinthaisong, I. (2018). Job satisfaction and employee engagement among human resources staff of Thai private higher education institutions. The Journal of Behavioral Science, 13(2), 68-81.

Tepper, B. J., Dimotakis, N., Lambert, L. S., Koopman, J., Matta, F. K., Man Park, H., & Goo, W. (2018). Examining follower responses to transformational leadership from a dynamic, person–environment fit perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 61(4), 1343-1368.

Tsaur, S. H., Hsu, F. S., & Lin, H. (2019). Workplace fun and work engagement in tourism and hospitality: The role of psychological capital. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 81, 131-140.

Van Vianen, A. (2018). Person–environment fit: A review of its basic tenets. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5, 75-101.

Vandenberg, R.J., & Nelson, J.B. (1999). Disaggregating the motives underlying turnover intentions: When do intentions predict turnover behavior? Human Relations, 52, 1313–1336.

Vorina, A., Simonič, M., & Vlasova, M. (2017). An analysis of the relationship between job satisfaction and employee engagement. Economic themes, 55(2), 243-262.

Wang, D., Zong, Z., Mao, W., Wang, L., Maguire, P., & Hu, Y. (2021). Investigating the relationship between person–environment fit and safety behavior: A social cognition perspective. Journal of Safety Research, 79, 100-109.

Wang, K., & Wang, Y. (2018). Person-environment fit and employee creativity: the moderating role of multicultural experience. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, article 1980.

Wang, T. K., & Brower, R. (2018). Job satisfaction among federal employees: The role of employee interaction with work environment. Public Personnel Management, 48(1), 3–26.

Wang, Y., Hu, N., Zuo, J., & Rameezdeen, R. (2020). Project management personnel turnover in public sector construction organizations in China. Journal of Management in Engineering, 36(2), 05019009.

Warr, P., & Inceoglu, I. (2012). Job engagement, job satisfaction, and contrasting associations with person–job fit. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17(2), 129.

White, D. R., Kyle, M. J., & Schafer, J. A. (2021). Police officers’ job satisfaction: Combining public service motivation and person-environment fit. Journal of Crime and Justice, 1–18.

Wu, L., & Norman, I. J. (2006). An investigation of job satisfaction, organizational commitment and role conflict and ambiguity in a sample of Chinese undergraduate nursing students. Nurse education today, 26(4), 304-314.

Xiang, H., Chen, Y., & Zhao, F. (2017, July). Inclusive leadership, perceived organizational support, and work engagement: the moderating role of leadership-member exchange relationship. In 7th International Conference on Social Network, Communication and Education (SNCE), Shenyang, China.

Xiao, Y., Dong, M., Shi, C., Zeng, W., Shao, Z., Xie, H., & Li, G. (2021). Person–environment fit and medical professionals’ job satisfaction, turnover intention, and professional efficacy: A cross-sectional study in Shanghai. PloS one, 16(4), e0250693.

Yu, K. Y. T. (2009). Affective influences in person–environment fit theory: Exploring the role of affect as both cause and outcome of PE fit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), article 1210.

Zhu, Q., Yin, H., Liu, J., & Lai, K. H. (2014). How is employee perception of organizational efforts in corporate social responsibility related to their satisfaction and loyalty towards developing harmonious society in Chinese enterprises?. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 21(1), 28-40.