Economic Agents’ Behaviors in Monopoly and Perfect Competition

Topic: Economics
Words: 847 Pages: 3
Table of Contents

Introduction

A natural monopoly is a theory circumstance in which only one business can provide goods and services to the people. A pure monopoly is the inverse of a perfect competition market, in which there is an unlimited number of companies. The monopolistic market can limit output, raise prices, and appreciate super-normal profits over time in a primary monopolization model. A monopolistic market is a competitive structure that resembles pure dominance. According to Crapis et al. (2017), “a monopolist offers a product to a market of consumers with heterogeneous quality preferences” (p. 3586). Monopolies can be considered when one company provides a specific product or service to a large number of consumers. The dominance, or influencing company, has complete control in a monopolistic market, determining the price and delivery of an item or service. In the apparent lack of ultimate entry barriers, such as a prohibition on competition or full ownership of all land and resources, pure monopolistic markets are scarce, if not inconceivable. This work was written with the aim of studying the behavior of economic agents in various situations.

Main body

When this happens, the monopoly that determines the cost and delivery of a service or product is the price maker. A monopoly is an earnings maximization since it can increase profits by changing the availability and price of a good or service being provided. The monopoly can discover the volume of production that enhances its profit by determining the proportion at which its contribution margin equals its variable costs.

Other companies could indeed enter the industry because only one seller controls the production and distribution of a good or service. High entry barriers, or challenges that preclude a corporation from entering the industry, are common. Possible market entrants are disadvantaged because the monopolistic competition has a first-mover benefit and can reduce costs to underprice a prospective beginner and protect them from increasing their market share. There are no replacements for the products or services because only one supplier and companies cannot enter or leave quickly. As a result, monopolistic competition has a complete differentiation strategy because no similar goods or services exist.

The perfect competition serves as a standard against which real-world market structures can be evaluated by comparing. Perfect competition is the conceptual inverse of monopolization, in which only one firm provides goods and services. That company can pay whatever valuation it wants because customers have no alternative solutions and would-be competitors find it difficult for the business. There are plenty of sellers and buyers in a market with perfect competition, and prices are reasonable market forces. Firms create only enough money to stay in the industry. If they made too much money, other businesses would enter the industry and ultimately reduce earnings.

Value is set by the crossroads of business prices and market delivery; business investors have no effect on market value in perfect competition. Market participants become price sensitive once market dynamics forces have defined the current value. The current value of an individual asset is determined by supply and demand forces. The market value is the cost at which aggregate supply equals the demand curve. The market rate is used to determine consumer and financial excess. The overall consumer and business surplus is referred to as the economic surplus.

In the long run, if firms in a perfectly competitive market receive bad financial profits, more companies will exit the market, shifting the demand curve to the left. The price will rise as the quantity supplied shifts to the left. Economic income will increase as the price rises until it hits zero. Financial gain will be relatively low if the market is highly competitive. This is due to the fact that consumers would only buy from the cheapest companies. The concept of competitiveness is also essential. If the entrance is simple, companies will always suffer the effects of the contest, even if it is only a blow contest – and profits will suffer as a result.

Contests among businesses can accelerate the development of new and improved products or more effective operations. Companies may compete to be the ones to bring a new or distinct product to the marketplace. Customers benefit from new and improved products as well as growing economic expansion and standard of living as a result of innovation. It provides jobs and gives people a variety of businesses and worksites to choose from. Contest also diminishes the need for government intervention through corporate regulation. A competitive free market benefits customers and the community while preserving individual liberties.

Summary

To summarize, a monopoly firm is a conceptual situation where only one company might provide products and services to people. A monopolistic market is an inverse of a market with perfect competition, in which there is an infinite number of companies. A monopolistic market can restrict output, increase costs, and accumulate super-normal profits over time in a primary monopolization prototype. Perfect competition provides a benchmark upon which actual market structures can be compared. The abstract inverse of monopolization is perfect competition, in which only one company supplies goods and services.

Reference

Crapis, D., Ifrach, B., Maglaras, C., & Scarsini, M. (2017). Monopoly pricing in the presence of social learning. Management Science, 63(11), 3586-3608.