An Engagement Strategy for Increasing Productivity

Topic: HR Management
Words: 595 Pages: 2

Introduction

Increasing productivity, team cohesion, and work-life balance – an engagement strategy provides many benefits. In addition, it can help team members work to their full potential at no additional cost. Consequently, in order to achieve higher profits and success for everyone in the business, it is necessary to encourage employees to perform efficiently. It is essential to consider ways of increasing productivity and staff interest in achieving the company’s goal.

Reasons for Not Stimulating Worker Productivity in the UK

Employers are cautious about providing training and requalification to workers in the UK because they cannot assess how effectively they can master the program and whether they have a profitable investment. For small businesses, the investment in training for employees is too high, so they cannot improve performance. In addition, managers often cannot find out exactly what the problem is and what type of training can stimulate employee efficiency (Bröchner, 2017). In order to solve this, it is necessary to begin by preparing a management team that understands the issue of human resources. It should be noted that even if a company has the tools to train and managers can identify the challenge, quite often, businesses are resistant to training, believing that it is only required for the early stages of life and not for professional workers.

Another reason for the absence of productivity in British businesses is the lack of a clear structure and division of responsibilities. This is particularly detrimental to family businesses, which make up 64% of manufacturing companies in the UK. Without a precise structure, their productivity is twenty percent less than that of their German competitors (Bröchner, 2017). At the same time, these family firms also abandoned the most recent methods that would help employees do their jobs faster and more productively. Consequently, many managers have no goal of investing time and resources in productivity; they operate on inertia.

Improvement for my Organization

Considering that the organization is transitioning to autonomous management, an important strategy is to involve employees from specific agencies in the hiring process. Many executives fully delegate hiring to other employees, explaining that they are swamped. The main goal of hiring is to create a team of workers who will benefit the company and contribute to its development (Bröchner, 2017). Accordingly, organizational leaders need to follow the processes in medical facilities, speaking with employees and patients to understand what kind of specialist they need.

Thus, if managers understand the problems that arise in their work and are able to find someone with the right qualifications, they will fill the gaps in requirements. Accordingly, then the staff will work cohesively, quickly, and most importantly productively if the General Systems Theory is applied (Bröchner, 2017). Once the manager identifies and needs an employee who is right at a particular time for a specific institution, the system will work effectively. Another solution to improve medical centers’ performance is to conduct training and explain the new rules of work, taking into account the immunity of the form of ownership. Thus, if necessary, employees can take additional qualification courses to ensure work productivity in the new environment.

Conclusion

In summary, the organization and education of workers is a critical element for an enterprise to function productively. That is, business owners in the UK should follow new methods and adopt successful experiences. This is especially important for medical facilities because it is the efficiency of the workforce that can potentially save human lives. Accordingly, investing in human resources and properly organizing teamwork will enable organizations to achieve measurable progress in a short period.

Reference

Bröchner, J. (2017). Measuring the productivity of facilities management. Journal of Facilities Management, 15(3), 285-301.