Introduction
There are two fundamental ways of thinking when it comes to predicting the financial future of an organization. A component of philosophy stresses the significance of accurate prediction. According to proponents of this hypothesis, if the estimations are inaccurate, firms will either have an excess of resources or a lack of resources (Kilimci et al., 2019). One school of thought claims that future demand cannot be accurately predicted and that the only way to keep customers satisfied is to build an operation adaptable enough to fulfill orders regardless of the uncertainty of market trends (Hofmann & Rutschmann, 2018). When it comes to determining how much time should be spent on forecasting the future, there is no clear answer that can be given. The operation of the firm is considered the most essential (Gupta & Ramachandran, 2021). In this context, two perspectives will be examined; one is based on the idea that responsiveness is essential in supply chain management, while the other feel that precision is more vital (Chon & Park, 2020; Zhu & Kouhizadeh, 2019). However, corporates should aim to use and apply improved technology that incorporates both responsiveness and accuracy in forecasting demand.
Argument for Accurate Forecast
In other words, forecasting is the capacity to look into the future and make informed estimates regarding various production components, including material procurement, job allocation, and logistics management, among others. Forecasting is such an increasingly significant proposition for manufacturing organizations that 2018 research by Fattah and colleagues revealed that accurate forecasting and demand fluctuation to be two of the main challenges manufacturing companies face in managing their supply flows (Fattah et al., 2018; Xiao et al., 18). Consequently, if businesses fail to do so, they will always end up with either an excess or a shortfall of resources (Kumar et al., 2017). This is one of the viewpoints offered since an accurate prediction helps regulate cash flow, reduce expenditures, schedule production, ensure opportunities are not missed and plan operations.
More Effective Production Scheduling
A company’s past data may assist them in forecasting its future, but they still need to prevent future numerous demand variations. Forecasting enables businesses to look into the future to minimize this hypothetical variation via more efficient production scheduling to satisfy consumer needs and market pressures and align with the availability of components and raw materials (Asamoah et al., 2021). Since forecasting gives manufacturing organizations an advantage in planning and production cycles, companies may work more flexibly, openly, and adaptable to changing production environments or schemes.
Moreover, an accurate sales and demand prediction is vital for ensuring prompt payment of bills. This must be accomplished quantitatively and qualitatively (Kilimci et al., 2019). This will lessen borrowing dependency, minimizing the likelihood of incurring interest payments. Furthermore, this reduces the possibility of accruing penalties and losing access to essential suppliers (Chon & Park, 2020). Quarterly meetings with sales employees and customers to assess predicted sales and demand may assist firms in budget management and production maintenance. These sessions should also be used to solicit client input.
Inventory Management
A company can better comprehend and anticipate demand or orders for specific items. In that case, it may more effectively collaborate with its suppliers to maintain optimum inventory levels and limit the chance of component overages or shortages. Forecasting skills enable industrial organizations to estimate the amount of customer demand more precisely versus the number of components required to complete orders and meet specified delivery windows effectively (Grewal et al., 2021). This is achieved by scheduling production near anticipated sales or delivery needs (Asamoah et al., 2021). If they spread production following actual sales and demand projections, they may be better able to satisfy the demands of their customers and consumers. To differentiate sales from demand further, some customers, often retailers, may need to restock their shelves and warehouses before things begin selling (Wu & Zhang, 2011). Consequently, inventory management reduces the quantity of storage or container space. It helps organizations simplify their operations by preventing expensive losses by drastically lowering the period unneeded product remains in a warehouse.
Cost Reduction
Even while forecasting minimizes the expenses associated with wasted materials or parts, it also helps businesses save money by allowing them to avoid ordering more inventory than is required to satisfy client requests. In addition, forecasting helps lower expenses connected with a variety of other essential production operations, such as job assignment and planning, procurement of raw materials, and even some front-office or customer-facing responsibilities (Kumar et al., 2017). It influences the whole production cycle, and production cycles influence each link in the value chain, a more optimal and cost-effective production system results in a more productive and cost-effective production process.
Using the Enhancements Adjustments to Personnel and job allocation predictions, businesses may change staffing to suit swings in annual operations. According to Asamoah et al. (2021), adjusting the team size is necessary since certain seasons are often slower than others. This will save time and money that would have been spent on training additional staff members who would only be required for a short time or on hiring new people to fulfill peak demand (Akhter et al., 2019). Primarily, understanding the demand may assist in identifying the number of sales at which adding another shift to improve the company’s production capacity will be viable. When firms have a precise estimate of the personnel needed, they can create a more effective organizational structure. This, in turn, helps to recruit and hire employees more deliberately.
Enhanced promotions with a sharper focus even if the business is slow, one should continue all attempts to advertise the company. If companies can map their revenue over the year, they may decide whether to spend more on advertising during slow times and store that money for more expensive campaigns during times of great demand (Hugos, 2018). Using an annual or quarterly media strategy, businesses may avoid the stress of finding a replacement at the last minute by ensuring that reliable marketing contractors will be available when their services are required.
Optimized Transport Logistics
When examining its transport operations, a company may discover that carrying a given amount of goods to a particular place incurs enormous expenditures. Therefore, this organization may combine shipments, uses many modes of transport, or even alter delivery dates depending on client demand to limit or minimize these expenses. Forecasting enables businesses to go one step further by carefully analyzing their transportation plan to discover areas where efficiency can be boosted, and redundancies can be reduced (Kumar et al., 2017). Forecasting enables businesses to determine when, how, and why the most strategic transport choices may be implemented and the value these activities offer to their supply logistics, given that successful transport logistics are the quickest and most efficient means to get items from A to B.
Argument for Making the Operation Sufficiently Responsive
A company’s responsiveness is its capacity to recognize and efficiently adjust to the constant evolution of its industry and consumers’ preferences. Companies that effectively respond to innovation are better positioned to deal with disruption and continually surpass customer expectations (Bock et al., 2020). According to Hofmann and Rutschmann (2018), the nature of demand assures that it will always be unexpected; hence, an alternative to accurate forecasting is necessary in business forecasting. In order to maintain a high level of customer satisfaction, business operations must be adaptable enough to accept uncertainty while still meeting client demands (Hofmann & Rutschmann, 2018). Given the fluctuating nature of demand, the second school of thought maintains that the ability to react quickly is more essential than the ability to react precisely (Zhu & Kouhizadeh, 2019). As a result, responsiveness requires making extra efforts and, in certain instances, providing personalized service. Maintaining an efficient supply chain is essential in considering not just one’s demands but also those of consumers (Richey et al., 2022). Even though there is no universal strategy for facilitating transition, there is a common objective that businesses may pursue: responsiveness.
Capability to Boost Delivery Speed
In the business world, both prosperous and challenging periods are unavoidable (Copacino, 2019). Season and economic conditions are expected to have a significant impact on sales. The supply chain must be prepared to adapt swiftly to a change in demand. The delivery rate will depend on a firm’s capacity to spot opportunities among fluctuating demand (Mikalef et al., 2019). Identifying is the capacity to recognize opportunities inside the organization and in the market. According to Walter (2021), the ability to identify opportunities is greatly influenced by the accessibility of insights produced by business intelligence and analytics. The ability to properly deploy these systems of insight indicates that a firm has contextualized and prioritized its information. It also shows that a firm has understood the influence of external variables on its performance, and can consistently make this knowledge accessible to decision-makers at the appropriate moment.
Customer Satisfaction is a Top Focus
Even the most efficient supply chain may sometimes have disruptions due to human factors. For example, businesses may need to order the correct product. Eventually, they learn to see things differently (Wu & Zhang, 2011). As a result, they demand fast help; hence, the necessity for a rapid supply chain becomes immediately apparent at this point. However, the return procedure is straightforward, and customer service is of the highest caliber (Adivar et al., 2019). Customers are deemed satisfied when their requests are met and know they may contact the firm if they have problems (Vosooghidizaji et al., 2020). Due to the unpredictability of reality, there is no such thing as a completely accurate diagnosis. There is no such thing as a scholar with perfect accuracy (Feizabadi, 2022). Even if the company’s sales personnel is skilled at creating accurate market projections and understanding customer demand, this will never happen (Akhter et al., 2019). Whoever asserts otherwise is trying to sell them something or is telling a falsehood.
Transforming
Companies must not only be able to recognize opportunities but also continuously reconfigure their resources and skills to accomplish so. The capacity of a corporation to review and reconfigure its internal and external skills constitutes transformation. Companies must broadly assess the breadth and depth of their resources to guarantee they can successfully handle their continuing business problems (Santoni de Sio & Van den Hoven, 2018). This implies a continual reinvention of processes and business models, a focus on organizational learning, and substantial investments in corporate infrastructure.
Response to the Above Opposing Views
Responsiveness may be described as the supply chain’s capacity to react intentionally and promptly to customer demands or market fluctuations. In contrast, a supply chain is accurate if cost reduction is prioritized and no resources are spent on non-value-added tasks during forecasting. Managing the clash between these two aspects presents the most significant obstacles. However, each approach has advantages and disadvantages concerning organization resource planning. Even while accuracy helps reduce resource waste, there is always the potential for improvement, resulting in underutilized capacity (Tseng et al., 2019). Maintaining a fast reaction time is one of the essential criteria in retaining pleased clients who can handle unforeseen demand surges.
Good quality, accurate product data will offer supply chain planners all the data they require about an item to guarantee that supplies are delivered on time, within cost, and with a lean inventory control strategy (Asamoah et al., 2021). In this situation, the first step is to verify that all of the information utilized to generate the product is accurate and as comprehensive as possible. In contrast, there must be clear images of the item, a list of its components, precise and up-to-date technical specifications, and a detailed product description. Another crucial element is the universal part or product number (Akhter et al., 2019). This is the foundation upon which every supply chain activity is built. If the preceding phase is not well handled, it is irrelevant that the resources were purchased at a low cost or that the things reached their destination swiftly. If something does not meet the conditions, it would be a waste of time and effort to do it.
In order to be responsive to operations along the demand chain, there are aspects beyond exact product information to consider. Responsiveness spans the whole supply chain network, including all stakeholders and partners (Feizabadi, 2022). Researchers who study logistics (operations), relationship dyads, and the extended supply chain network might benefit from adopting responsiveness as their primary goal. According to this study, responsiveness is the procedure and outcome of organizational adjustments made by individual enterprises within a supply chain to situate the distribution network and its members favorably to provide customer value in the face of changing environmental conditions (Kilimci et al., 2019). The time and resources devoted to forecasting should be proportional to the organization’s demands. In specific companies, promptness takes priority over correctness.
Both responsiveness and accuracy are required in business and should be used simultaneously. Successful supply chains need rapid response times and large-scale, dependable purchases. Being punctual involves more effort and, in certain instances, increases a specialized service delivery (Pirabán et al., 2019). However, they are complementary since they contribute to the same result (Hofmann & Rutschmann, 2018). In reality, there is no “optimal” fulfillment technique, but an exceptional choice matches the organization’s needs (Richey et al., 2022). According to Adivar et al. (2019), enterprises that go the extra mile for their consumers see increased profits. American Express reports that customers are prepared to spend 17% more with firms that deliver outstanding service (Lou & Ma, 2018). To accommodate swings in customer demand, however, service providers may emphasize response more. Consequently, selecting a solution that enables both responsiveness and accuracy in predicting is essential (Von Briel, 2018. Such a system would integrate tools for demand management, optimization engines, complicated event processing, role-based dashboards, decision management technologies, performance measurement analytics, and, most crucially, real-time or near-real-time data.
Conclusion
Any supply chain’s principal goals are to meet customer demands and increase revenue; the cash supply chain is not an exception to this norm. Each business technique works only for some situations regarding responsiveness and forecasting accuracy since both have benefits and drawbacks. For example, accurate forecasting provides efficient production planning, inventory control, cost control, and improved transport logistics. On the other hand, responsiveness in operations is crucial since demand cannot be accurately predicted in the future. Thus, the only way to keep customers happy is to design an adaptable operation to meet demand despite the volatility of sales forecasts. In this instance, ensuring customer happiness and prompt delivery of products and services to customers via operational responsiveness supports total company transformation. However, corporate planning needs to prioritize responsiveness. In this sense, a firm may choose to stress either accuracy or responsiveness as the primary approach to separate itself from competitors based on its business plan. However, if the company can enhance both, it will have a long-lasting competitive edge. This objective is achievable using intelligent business operations’ working styles and technologies.
References
Adivar, B., Hüseyinoğlu, I. Ö. Y., & Christopher, M. (2019). A quantitative performance management framework for assessing omnichannel retail supply chains. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 48(1), 257-269. Web.
Akhter, M. N., Mekhilef, S., Mokhlis, H., & Mohamed Shah, N. (2019). Review on forecasting of photovoltaic power generation based on machine learning and metaheuristic techniques. IET Renewable Power Generation, 13(7), 1009-1023. Web.
Asamoah, D., Nuertey, D., Agyei-Owusu, B., & Akyeh, J. (2021). The effect of supply chain responsiveness on customer development. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 32(4), 1190-1213. Web.
Bock, D. E., Wolter, J. S., & Ferrell, O. C. (2020). Artificial intelligence: Disrupting what we know about services. Journal of Services Marketing, 34(3), 317-334. Web.
Chon, M. G., & Park, H. (2020). Social media activism in the digital age: Testing an integrative model of activism on contentious issues. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 97(1), 72-97. Web.
Copacino, W. C. (2019). Supply chain management: The basics and beyond. Routledge.
Fattah, J., Ezzine, L., Aman, Z., El Moussami, H., & Lachhab, A. (2018). Forecasting of demand using ARIMA model. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 10(1), 1-9. Web.
Feizabadi, J. (2022). Machine learning demand forecasting and supply chain performance. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 25(2), 119-142. Web.
Grewal, D., Gauri, D. K., Roggeveen, A. L., & Sethuraman, R. (2021). Strategizing retailing in the new technology era. Journal of Retailing, 97(1), 6-12. Web.
Gupta, S., & Ramachandran, D. (2021). Emerging market retail: Transitioning from a product-centric to a customer-centric approach. Journal of Retailing, 97(4), 597-620. Web.
Hofmann, E., & Rutschmann, E. (2018). Big data analytics and demand forecasting in supply chains: A conceptual analysis. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 29(2), 739-766. Web.
Hugos, M. H. (2018). Essentials of supply chain management. John Wiley & Sons.
Kilimci, Z. H., Akyuz, A. O., Uysal, M., Akyokus, S., Uysal, M. O., Atak Bulbul, B., & Ekmis, M. A. (2019). An improved demand forecasting model using a deep learning approach and proposed decision integration strategy for the supply chain. Complexity, 1(1), 1-16. Web.
Kumar, V., Anand, A., & Song. (2017). Future of retailer profitability: An organizing framework. Journal of Retailing, 93(1), 96-119. Web.
Lou, W., & Ma, J. (2018). Complexity of sales effort and carbon emission reduction effort in a two-parallel household appliance supply chain model. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 64(1), 398-425. Web.
Mikalef, P., Boura, M., Lekakos, G., & Krogstie, J. (2019). Big data analytics capabilities and innovation: The mediating role of dynamic capabilities and moderating effect of the environment. British Journal of Management, 30(2), 272-298. Web.
Pirabán, A., Guerrero, W. J., & Labadie, N. (2019). Survey on blood supply chain management: Models and methods. Computers & Operations Research, 112(1), 104756. Web.
Richey, R. G., Roath, A. S., Adams, F. G., & Wieland, A. (2022). A responsiveness view of logistics and supply chain management. Journal of Business Logistics, 43(1), 62-91. Web.
Santoni de Sio, F., & Van den Hoven, J. (2018). Meaningful human control over autonomous systems: A philosophical account. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 5(15), 1-14. Web.
Tseng, M. L., Wu, K. J., Lim, M. K., & Wong, W. P. (2019). Data-driven sustainable supply chain management performance: A hierarchical structure assessment under uncertainties. Journal of Cleaner Production, 227(1), 760-771. Web.
Von Briel, F. (2018). The future of omnichannel retail: A four-stage Delphi study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 132(1), 217-229. Web.
Vosooghidizaji, M., Taghipour, A., & Canel-Depitre, B. (2020). Supply chain coordination under information asymmetry: A review. International Journal of Production Research, 58(6), 1805-1834. Web.
Walter, A. T. (2021). Organizational agility: Ill-defined and somewhat confusing? A systematic literature review and conceptualization. Management Review Quarterly, 71(2), 343-391. Web.
Xiao, C., Wilhelm, M., van der Vaart, T., & Van Donk, D. P. (2019). Inside the buying firm: Exploring responses to paradoxical tensions in sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 55(1), 3-20. Web.
Zhu, Q., & Kouhizadeh, M. (2019). Blockchain technology, supply chain information, and strategic product deletion management. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 47(1), 36-44. Web.